| Author(s) | Karl Marx |
|---|---|
| Written | 29 February 1856 |
MARX TO ENGELS
IN MANCHESTER
[London,] 29 February 1856
28 Dean Street, Soho
Dear Engels,
For the whole of this week I've had a visitor in the person of G. Levy from Düsseldorf, sent over as their delegate by the workers there. He only left yesterday and took up all my spare time, so that despite the best of intentions I did not succeed in writing to you. Further on I shall give you an account of the news, some of it important, of which he was the CARRIER.[1]
Not one of the 3 books you asked for was available at Norgate and Williams. I have ordered the Lay of Igor[2] but wanted to let you know about the other two first.
Dobrowsky's 'Slavin', Hanka edition, is very far from fulfilling the expectations aroused by its title. The book falls into 2 parts as regards the contents, if not the arrangement, viz.:
1. Short ESSAYS on Slavonic linguistic studies which, in view of more recent studies, could at most be of antiquarian interest (e.g. sample from the Wendish New Testament, Slavonic declension, on the Slavonic translation of the Old Testament, etc.).
2. An attempt, wholly devoid of polemic bite, to reconstitute the character of the Slav peoples in integrum.[3] This is done by taking excerpts from sundry works, mostly German writings. Here is a list of these essays, which make up the bulk of the book[4] :
'Slawische Völker'. (From Herder's Ideen[5] etc.) 'Sitten der Croaten'. (From von Engels' Geschichte von Dalma- tien, Croatien, Slavonien. Halle 1798.)
'Sitten und Gebräuche der Illyrier, der Morlaken etc' (From ditto.)
'Charakter der Illyrier'. (From Taube's Beschreibung des König- reichs Slavonien. Leipzig 1777.)
'Die Tracht der Illyrier'. (From Hacquet's Beobachtungen auf einer Reise nach Semlin.[6] )
'Prokops Schilderung der Slawen und Anten'. (From Stritter's 'Geschichte der Slawen nach den Byzantinern' in Schlözer's Allgemeine Nordische Geschichte.)
'Auszüge aus des Herrn Professor B. Hacquet's Abbildung und Beschreibung der Südwest- und östlichen Slawen'.
'Volkstümliches der Russen'. (From Dupré de St. Maure, Observations sur les moeurs et les usages russes. Paris 1829. 3 vols.)
'Charakter und Kultur der Slawen im Allgemeinen'. (From Schaffarik, Geschichte der slawischen Sprache, etc. Ofen[7] 1826.)
That's about all. Appended is 'Der böhmische Cato' in Czech, 'from an old manuscript described by the late Voigt in Acta litter aria.[8]
Dobrowsky writes in a bumbling, good-natured, naive style, with the greatest cordiality towards his German colleagues, whether 'late' or still living. All that seemed of interest to me in the Slavin were a few passages in which he directly recognises the Germans as the fathers of Slavonic historical and linguistic studies.
As regards linguistic studies, he cites among others 'Schlözer, Vorschlag zu einer allgemeinen vergleichenden slawischen Sprachlehre und Wörterbuch.[9] Further, 'Schlözer, Vorschlag, das Russische vollkommen richtig und genau mit lateinischer Schrift auszudrücken'. In general 'Herr Hofrat Schlözer' would appear to be the patriarch of whom the others profess to be the disciples.
'Schlözer's Nestor: A work indispensable to anyone wishing to acquaint himself with the critical approach to Slavonic history in general and the Russian annals in particular.'
Of Voigt's Geschichte Preussens:
'Was the first to acquaint the Bohemians with the monuments of Antiquity.'[10]
Also cited: 'Johann Leonhard Frischen's Programmen von der slawischen Literatur', 1727-1736,
'which has elucidated the history of several Slavonic dialects'.
'Slawischer Bücherdruck in Würtenberg im löten Jahrhundert. Ein literarischer Bericht von Chr. Friedr. Schnurrer, Prof. in Tübingen, 1799'—
'a very valuable book which contains the finest and most important contribu- tions to the history of Wendish and Croat bibliography'.
Others cited are: Schlözer, Allgemeine Nordische Geschichte. Joli. Christoph de Jordan, De originibus Slavicis opus etc., Vienna 1745,
fol. 2. Father Gelasius Dobner, ad Hajek, Annales Bohemorum, Prague 1761 and '63. (Of this Schlözer remarks: primus delirare desiit[11] ) Stritter, Memoriae poptdorum ad Danubium e Script. Byzan- tinis, Petersburg 1774. Gercken, Versuch in der ältesten Geschichte der Slaven, Leipzig 1771. Gatterer's Einleitung in die synchronistische Universalhistorie, Göttingen 1771, and Gebhardi, Allgemeine Welt- historie, 1789.
Of all these works only the titles are given, with the exception of the opinions extracted above. Voilà le 'Slavin'![12]
As regards the 3rd work, the tide is: Dr. M. W. Heffter, Der Weltkampf der Deutschen und Slaven seit dem Ende des 5ten Jahrhunderts, 1847 (costs 7/-). Even in his preface the author admits that he only has a detailed and first-hand knowledge of Slavonic history in so far as it refers to the Prussian 'Fatherland'. More than 3/4 of his book of 481 pages is devoted to the period between the end of the 5di century and 1147. Only here and there does the remainder go beyond the 13th, or at latest the 14th, century, and then quite cursorily.
Having given you an opinion on these two works, I await your instructions whether or not to order them. Another book by Heffter has been published: Das Slawentum, Leipzig 1852 (45 pages or so). Constitutes the 10th booklet in the Brockhaus series
Unterhaltungen, Belehrungen etc[13] A popular compendium of Slavonic history. It was from this little book I learned that in 1849 Nicholas issued a ukase by which
'all his subjects were strictly forbidden to take part in Pan-Slavism'.
At the Museum I discovered, and made extracts from, 5 manuscript folio volumes on Russia (18th century only). They are part of the literary legacy of ARCHDEACON Coxe, known for his zeal as a collector.[14] They contain many original (hitherto unpublished) letters from English ambassadors in Petersburg to the Cabinet here, some of them VERY COMPROMISING INDEED. Amongst the papers dated 1768 there is a manuscript by one of the Embassy attachés on 'the character of the Russian nation'.[15] I shall send you some extracts from it. There is also interesting information on the Russian 'artels' by the Embassy chaplain, a cousin of Pitt's.[16]
Although anti-Russian, recent French writings are, with few exceptions, almost all tinged with Pan-Slavism. Thus Desprez,[17] but more particularly Cyprien Robert who, in Paris in 1848, published the journal, La Pologne. Annales contemporaines des peuples de l'Europe orientale, etc. The same man has published, among other things, Les Slaves de la Turquie, édition de 1844, précédée d'une introduction, etc., 8°, Paris 1852. Further, Le Monde slave, son passé, son état présent et son avenir, Paris 1852. A Parisian author,[18] whose
nom de guerre is Edmond, but who is said to be a Pole, is exceptional in having published an exceedingly venomous attack on Russian pretensions to socialism, and comments on their communes, etc. I haven't yet been able to trace this, but shall have a look at the Revue des deux Mondes which apparently contains extracts from it.
I began this letter today with the intention of sending you masses of gossip. But, having strayed off in another direction and time being short, I shall leave that till tomorrow and confine myself for today to telling you that Heise, under the influence of strong liquor (so Imandt writes), is rapidly approaching his end[19] ; that Oswald—of tobacco and refugee fame—who doesn't speak a word of French, has been appointed Professor of the French Language at UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, London; that Ruge's friends are putting it around that he's suffering from 'dropsy' though it's probably nothing but water on the brain; that a number of German worthies (Faucher, Meyen, Franck, Tausenau, etc.) will be meeting tomorrow chez mine host Kerb, in order to achieve an entente cordiale as to the Fatherland's requirements, and that 'Meyen' has expressed the 'hope' that he can persuade Bûcher to 'take part' in this confabulation; finally, that Proudhon has become a director of the royal imperial French railways.
Salut.
Your
K. M.