| Author(s) | Arnold Ruge |
|---|---|
| Written | 25 January 1869 |
ARNOLD RUGE TO STEINTHAL[1]
IN MANCHESTER
Brighton, 25 January 1869
7 Park Crescent
Dear Mr Steinthal,
At the same time as this letter, I am sending you Marx on capital by book-post.
Many thanks! This book has given me constant food for thought, though I had to work on all sorts of other things at the same time.
It is an epoch-making work and throws a shining and often scorching light on the development of the social periods, with the declines, the birth-pains, and the frightful days of agony.
The proofs of surplus value through unpaid labour, of the expropriation of the workers who had worked for themselves, and of the coming expropriation of the expropriators, are classical.
On the latter, p. 745[2] : 'The capitalist mode of production and appropriation, hence capitalist property, is the first negation of individual private property, as founded on the labour of the proprietor. The negation of this negation therefore again gives the producer individual property, but based on the acquisitions of the capitalist era: i.e., on the co-operation of free labourers and their possession in common of the land and of the means of production produced by labour itself
Marx is a man of broad erudition and with a brilliant dialectical talent. His book is above the level of many people and newspaper writers; but it will quite certainly make its way, and exercise a powerful influence, despite its broad scope; yes, precisely because of this.
With regard to religion, the author states very accurately: 608: 'As, in religion, man is governed by the products of his own brain, so in capitalistic production, he is governed by the products of his own hand.'
And to liberate him, it by no means suffices to shine a light in the owl's eye; in fact, whenever he loses his master, like the Frenchman or the Spaniard, then he himself installs one over himself again.
But still all the best for 1869! May it stand the test like its predecessor! My best
greetings
to
Mrs Steinthal
and
Mr Heydemann.
Yours sincerely
Dr A. Ruge